# Mining Facility Overhead Energy — Named Scenario Comparison

> Mining Facility Overhead Energy — Named Scenario Comparison is a paid API for AI agents from market.datapackvibe.com, paid per call via x402, $0.01/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-10-15).

Compares named scenarios for mining facility overhead energy consumption using PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) and IT load inputs, returning a bounded scenario comparison report.

## Facts

- Endpoint: POST https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-bx-mining-pue-overhead-scenario?utm_source=zero.xyz
- Price: $0.01/call
- Payment: x402
- Status: unknown
- Last checked: 2026-10-15
- Activations on Zero: 0
- Tags: x402
- Canonical page: https://www.zero.xyz/c/mining-facility-overhead-energy-named-scenario-comparison-e4970040
- Structured record (JSON): https://api.zero.xyz/v1/capabilities/cap_9i7DxCZHHNgUuED2Ri3zW

Status and success rate cover calls made through Zero and Zero's own probes. Third-party monitors may report differently.

## How to call it through Zero

Zero handles the 402 payment challenge and records the run. With the Zero CLI installed (`npm i -g @zeroxyz/cli`):

```sh
zero fetch --capability mining-facility-overhead-energy-named-scenario-comparison-e4970040 -d '<json body>'
```

Example prompt: Compare two mining facility energy overhead scenarios for me: baseline is a PUE of 1.2 with 720 kWh IT load, and the alternative is a PUE of 1.5 with 792 kWh IT load — label it 'High PUE Config' and show me the overhead comparison report.

## When to prefer this

Choose this endpoint when you need to compare multiple named energy overhead scenarios for a mining facility under different PUE and IT load assumptions, and want a structured report with labeled results. It is best suited for what-if analyses and planning exercises where you have specific numeric assumptions and want to see overhead energy differences across named configurations. Not appropriate for live energy pricing, real-time monitoring, or guaranteed return calculations.

## Known failure modes

- Missing required baseline fields (it_kwh or pue) returns a validation error
- PUE value below 1 or above 10 is rejected as out of range
- IT kWh of 0 or negative is rejected (exclusiveMinimum enforced)
- Scenarios array with 0 items or more than 20 items is rejected
- Scenario label exceeding 80 characters is rejected
- Scenario overrides object with no properties (minProperties:1 violated) returns error
- Payment of less than 0.01 USDC fails to unlock the report

## How this service works

Mining facility overhead energy — Named scenario comparison: Named scenario comparison for Mining facility overhead energy. Supplied mining assumptions only; formula and units disclosed. No live prices, mining or guaranteed return. Specialised preset in a shared 50-profile, 20-operation engine. 0.01 USDC includes one bounded named scenario comparison report.

## Output

Returns a bounded named scenario comparison report showing overhead energy figures for each named scenario relative to the baseline, with PUE-adjusted calculations. The report includes per-scenario energy overhead values derived from the supplied PUE and IT kWh inputs using disclosed formulas and units. No live prices, mining yields, or return guarantees are included.

## Request schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "object",
 "properties": {
  "baseline": {
   "type": "object",
   "default": {
    "pue": 1.2,
    "it_kwh": 720
   },
   "required": [
    "it_kwh",
    "pue"
   ],
   "properties": {
    "pue": {
     "type": "number",
     "default": 1.2,
     "maximum": 10,
     "minimum": 1
    },
    "it_kwh": {
     "type": "number",
     "default": 720,
     "maximum": 10000000000000000,
     "minimum": 0,
     "exclusiveMinimum": 0
    }
   },
   "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "scenarios": {
   "type": "array",
   "items": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
     "label",
     "overrides"
    ],
    "properties": {
     "label": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 80,
      "minLength": 1
     },
     "overrides": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
       "pue": {
        "type": "number",
        "default": 1.2,
        "maximum": 10,
        "minimum": 1
       },
       "it_kwh": {
        "type": "number",
        "default": 720,
        "maximum": 10000000000000000,
        "minimum": 0,
        "exclusiveMinimum": 0
       }
      },
      "minProperties": 1,
      "additionalProperties": false
     }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
   },
   "default": [
    {
     "label": "Supplied alternative",
     "overrides": {
      "it_kwh": 792.0000000000001
     }
    }
   ],
   "maxItems": 20,
   "minItems": 1
  }
 }
}
```

## More

- Live health (JSON, refreshed every minute): https://www.zero.xyz/c/mining-facility-overhead-energy-named-scenario-comparison-e4970040/health.json
- [Zero catalog index](https://www.zero.xyz/llms.txt)
- [Other services from market.datapackvibe.com](https://www.zero.xyz/host/market.datapackvibe.com/llms.txt)