# OnchainPulse RECEIPTS — Full Token Due-Diligence Report > OnchainPulse RECEIPTS — Full Token Due-Diligence Report is a paid API for AI agents from onchainpulse.theaslangroupllc.com, paid per call via x402, $0.35/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-09-14). Returns a comprehensive, structured token due-diligence report covering contract safety, holder concentration, liquidity exit depth, market context, launch provenance, and optional narrative-consistency checks across Solana and 8 EVM chains. ## Facts - Endpoint: GET https://onchainpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/receipts - Price: $0.35/call - Payment: x402 - Status: unknown - Last checked: 2026-09-14 - Activations on Zero: 0 - Tags: x402 - Canonical page: https://www.zero.xyz/c/onchainpulse-receipts-full-token-due-diligence-report-717c13a7 - Structured record (JSON): https://api.zero.xyz/v1/capabilities/cap_fA-KXrbb9Pnf1WuF_ND9- Status and success rate cover calls made through Zero and Zero's own probes. Third-party monitors may report differently. ## How to call it through Zero Zero handles the 402 payment challenge and records the run. With the Zero CLI installed (`npm i -g @zeroxyz/cli`): ```sh zero fetch --capability onchainpulse-receipts-full-token-due-diligence-report-717c13a7 ``` Example prompt: Can you pull the full RECEIPTS due-diligence report on the token at contract address 0xabc123... on Base — include the honeypot check, taxes, LP lock, holder map, exit depth, and cross-reference their project site at https://exampletoken.io? ## When to prefer this Choose this endpoint when you need a single, comprehensive onchain token safety report that combines contract-level risk signals (honeypot simulation, taxes, dangerous owner powers), liquidity exit analysis, holder concentration, and optionally cross-references the project's own marketing claims — all in one structured call. Prefer it over narrower endpoints (e.g. a standalone exit-depth estimator or a standalone narrative checker) when you want the full due-diligence picture without assembling multiple API calls. Supports Solana plus 8 EVM chains including Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. ## Known failure modes - Unrecognized or invalid contract address returns an error indicating the token was not found on the specified chain - Unsupported chain identifier returns an error listing supported chains - Pool data unavailable (no live v3/v2 pool found) results in missing exit-depth fields - Project website URL unreachable causes narrative-consistency section to be omitted or flagged as unavailable - Rate limiting or upstream RPC failures may return a 402 or 5xx error - Newly deployed contracts with no holder history may return sparse holder-concentration data ## How this service works RECEIPTS — the full token due-diligence report in one call, data versus vibes: contract-safety facts (honeypot sell simulation, taxes, mint/owner powers, LP lock), labeled holder-concentration map, exit-depth from live v3/v2 pool math, market context, launch provenance (Robinhood Chain Doppler registry), plus claim-by-claim narrative-consistency vs the project site when its URL is passed. Structured checks, checks-passed count, explorer citations, no scores, no advice. Solana + 8 EVM chains. ## Output A structured JSON report containing: honeypot sell simulation outcome, buy/sell tax rates, mint and owner privilege flags, LP lock status, a labeled holder-concentration map, exit-depth estimates from live Uniswap v3/v2 pool math, current market context, launch provenance data from the Robinhood Chain Doppler registry, optional claim-by-claim narrative-consistency results vs the project website, a checks-passed count, and explorer citation URLs. No scores, no investment advice — raw structured facts only. ## Request schema (JSON Schema) ```json { "type": "object", "required": [ "address" ], "properties": { "url": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional project website URL — unlocks the claim-by-claim narrative-consistency section" }, "chain": { "type": "string", "description": "solana or one of: base, ethereum, bsc, arbitrum, polygon, optimism, avalanche, robinhood (default base)" }, "address": { "type": "string", "description": "Token contract address (0x… EVM) or mint (base58 Solana)" } } } ``` ## Response schema (JSON Schema) ```json { "type": "json", "example": { "data": { "market": { "liquidity_usd": 210000 }, "safety": { "is_honeypot": false }, "holders": { "top10_holder_pct": 61.4 }, "narrative": { "counts": { "consistent": 7, "inconsistent": 1 } }, "exit_depth": { "five_pct_impact_usd": 41000 } }, "chain": "base", "flags": [ "Top-10 non-LP wallets hold 61.4% of supply", "Site claims \"liquidity locked 12 months\"; observed LP locked/burned share is 4.2%" ], "token": { "name": "Example", "symbol": "EXM", "holders": "48213" }, "checks": [ { "check": "sell_simulation", "detail": "Sell simulation succeeded — not flagged as a honeypot", "result": "pass" }, { "check": "holder_concentration", "detail": "Top-10 non-LP wallets hold 61.4% of supply", "result": "flag" }, { "check": "narrative_consistency", "detail": "1 of 8 site claims does not match observed chain data", "result": "flag" } ], "address": "0x…", "explorer": "https://basescan.org/token/0x…", "disclaimer": "A structured set of observable on-chain facts and consistency checks at a point in time — the receipts, not a rating. Check results describe data, never intent, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice, a recommendation, or a prediction. Some checks can be inconclusive when upstream data is unavailable; the report says so rather than guessing.", "checks_passed": "7/9", "coverage_tier": "full" } } ``` ## More - Live health (JSON, refreshed every minute): https://www.zero.xyz/c/onchainpulse-receipts-full-token-due-diligence-report-717c13a7/health.json - [Zero catalog index](https://www.zero.xyz/llms.txt) - [Other services from onchainpulse.theaslangroupllc.com](https://www.zero.xyz/host/onchainpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/llms.txt)