# TensorFeed Provider Reliability Verdict

> TensorFeed Provider Reliability Verdict is a paid API for AI agents from tensorfeed.ai, paid per call via x402, $0.02/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-09-15).

Returns a ranked verdict on which AI provider/model best fits a given task, optimized by cost, speed, quality, or balance, based on live reliability and benchmark data.

## Facts

- Endpoint: GET https://tensorfeed.ai/api/premium/provider-reliability-verdict
- Price: $0.02/call
- Payment: x402
- Status: unknown
- Last checked: 2026-09-15
- Activations on Zero: 0
- Tags: x402
- Canonical page: https://www.zero.xyz/c/tensorfeed-provider-reliability-verdict-60dedfc6
- Structured record (JSON): https://api.zero.xyz/v1/capabilities/cap_ETvzO2XT5x4aeDxXS0AMM

Status and success rate cover calls made through Zero and Zero's own probes. Third-party monitors may report differently.

## How to call it through Zero

Zero handles the 402 payment challenge and records the run. With the Zero CLI installed (`npm i -g @zeroxyz/cli`):

```sh
zero fetch --capability tensorfeed-provider-reliability-verdict-60dedfc6
```

Example prompt: Which AI provider should I use for a long-form document summarization task — optimize for quality?

## When to prefer this

Use this endpoint when an AI agent needs to dynamically select the best model or provider for a specific task at runtime, especially when cost, speed, or quality trade-offs matter and live reliability signals are important. Prefer over static model comparison tables when freshness of provider status is critical.

## Known failure modes

- Missing or empty prompt returns 400 bad request
- Invalid optimize enum value returns validation error
- Provider data temporarily stale if upstream feeds are delayed
- No strong differentiation between providers may return tie or low-confidence verdict
- Rate limit exceeded returns 429 with retry guidance

## How this service works

Returns a ranked verdict on provider availability and latency reliability.

## Output

A ranked verdict identifying which AI provider and model best suits the described task given the chosen optimization goal, backed by live service status, pricing, and benchmark data aggregated across the AI ecosystem.

## Request schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "object",
 "required": [
  "input"
 ],
 "properties": {
  "input": {
   "type": "object",
   "required": [
    "type",
    "method"
   ],
   "properties": {
    "type": {
     "type": "string",
     "const": "http"
    },
    "method": {
     "enum": [
      "GET"
     ],
     "type": "string"
    },
    "queryParams": {
     "type": "object"
    }
   },
   "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "output": {
   "type": "object",
   "required": [
    "type"
   ],
   "properties": {
    "type": {
     "type": "string"
    },
    "example": {
     "type": "object"
    }
   }
  }
 }
}
```

## More

- Live health (JSON, refreshed every minute): https://www.zero.xyz/c/tensorfeed-provider-reliability-verdict-60dedfc6/health.json
- [Zero catalog index](https://www.zero.xyz/llms.txt)
- [Other services from tensorfeed.ai](https://www.zero.xyz/host/tensorfeed.ai/llms.txt)