# TradepilotUSA Proposal Review Agent

> TradepilotUSA Proposal Review Agent is a paid API for AI agents from www.tradepilotusa.com, paid per call via x402, $3/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-10-02).

Reviews and analyzes a business proposal task, identifying risks, evidence gaps, assumptions, and whether human review is required, then returns a structured summary and artifact.

## Facts

- Endpoint: POST https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/proposal_review_agent/execute?utm_source=zero.xyz
- Price: $3/call
- Payment: x402
- Status: unknown
- Last checked: 2026-10-02
- Activations on Zero: 0
- Tags: x402
- Canonical page: https://www.zero.xyz/c/tradepilotusa-proposal-review-agent-b212c59a
- Structured record (JSON): https://api.zero.xyz/v1/capabilities/cap_dZBXmfrT9cCKvM0ErFQKp

Status and success rate cover calls made through Zero and Zero's own probes. Third-party monitors may report differently.

## How to call it through Zero

Zero handles the 402 payment challenge and records the run. With the Zero CLI installed (`npm i -g @zeroxyz/cli`):

```sh
zero fetch --capability tradepilotusa-proposal-review-agent-b212c59a -d '<json body>'
```

Example prompt: Can you run this proposal draft through the TradepilotUSA proposal review agent and tell me what assumptions were made, what evidence gaps exist, and whether it needs human sign-off? Here's the proposal text: 'Northstar Studio proposes to redesign the bakery's five-page website, covering design and frontend only. Client supplies content and hosting access. Delivery in 4 weeks, $3,500 flat fee.'

## When to prefer this

Choose this endpoint when you need automated, structured review of a business proposal document — especially when you want to surface assumptions, evidence gaps, and risk signals before a proposal goes to a client or stakeholder. Prefer this over generic text summarization when you specifically need proposal-domain analysis with a human-review flag and provenance tracing. Best suited for freelancers, agencies, and operations teams who regularly produce client proposals and want a lightweight AI-assisted QA step before sending.

## Known failure modes

- Task string too short (under 10 characters) — validation error returned
- Task string exceeds 12,000 character limit — rejected with schema validation error
- Ambiguous or incomplete proposal text may produce shallow analysis with many evidence gaps flagged
- Payment failure at $3 USDC per call — 402 response if payment not completed
- Service timeout on very complex proposals — may return partial result or error

## How this service works

Use the proposal and risk register tools to synthesize a review-ready business proposal. Include supplied scope, deliverables, exclusions, acceptance criteria, dependencies, delivery milestones, explicit missing commercial terms, and a risk/mitigation matrix. Reconcile contradictions between tool drafts. Never invent approved prices, binding legal terms, signatures or commitments. Do not expand supplied scope: hosting access does not itself authorize deployment services; identify any proposed ad

## Output

Returns a structured JSON object containing: a plain-language summary of the proposal, a detailed artifact excerpt with the reviewed content, a list of assumptions the proposal makes, a list of evidence gaps (missing information), a boolean flag indicating whether human review is required, a provenance object showing which internal tools were used and how many model turns were needed, and a unique request ID for tracking.

## Request schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "object",
 "properties": {
  "task": {
   "type": "string",
   "maxLength": 12000,
   "minLength": 10
  }
 }
}
```

## Response schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "json",
 "example": {
  "summary": "Draft proposal for redesigning a fictional bakery's five-page website by Northstar Studio, covering design and frontend implementation only. The client supplies content and hosting access. Delivery is",
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Proposal for Website Redesign: Fictional Bakery\n\n### Overview\nNorthstar Studio proposes to redesign the fictional bakery's website, focusing on design and frontend implementation for a five-page site.\n\n---\n\n### Scope of Work\n- Design and frontend development of a five-page website.\n- Client to supply all approved copy, photographs, and hosting access credentials.\n\n### Exclusions\n- Ecommerce functionality.\n- Hosting fees.\n- Ongoing website maintenance.\n\n### Deliverables\n- Fully designed and fr",
  "provenance": {
   "tools": [
    {
     "tool": "proposal_draft",
     "revision_id": "7c318ac8-3ad7-4013-9e65-f1453413149a",
     "service_key": "proposal_draft"
    },
    {
     "tool": "risk_register",
     "revision_id": "c67e4d97-47b7-4b5b-8584-600e38a20094",
     "service_key": "risk_register"
    }
   ],
   "model_turns": 3
  },
  "request_id": "example_proposal_review_agent",
  "assumptions": [
   "Client will provide all approved copy, photos, and hosting access in a timely manner.",
   "The scope is limited strictly to design and frontend implementation with no backend or ecommerce development."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
   "Finalized payment schedule and terms.",
   "Revision limits and policy details."
  ],
  "requires_human_review": true
 }
}
```

## More

- Live health (JSON, refreshed every minute): https://www.zero.xyz/c/tradepilotusa-proposal-review-agent-b212c59a/health.json
- [Zero catalog index](https://www.zero.xyz/llms.txt)
- [Other services from www.tradepilotusa.com](https://www.zero.xyz/host/www.tradepilotusa.com/llms.txt)