# Vino & Views — Claim Worth-It Verdict

> Vino & Views — Claim Worth-It Verdict is a paid API for AI agents from api.vinoandviews.online, paid per call via x402, $0.15/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-10-10).

Returns an evidence-backed verdict on whether a claim, recommendation, or piece of wine/views content is 'worth it', with a SHA-256 receipt.

## Facts

- Endpoint: POST https://api.vinoandviews.online/v1/claim-worth-it?utm_source=zero.xyz
- Price: $0.15/call
- Payment: x402
- Status: unknown
- Last checked: 2026-10-10
- Activations on Zero: 0
- Tags: x402
- Canonical page: https://www.zero.xyz/c/vino-views-claim-worth-it-verdict-b6ba6309
- Structured record (JSON): https://api.zero.xyz/v1/capabilities/cap_uNkf0Vy8VFulbFqZGIIcf

Status and success rate cover calls made through Zero and Zero's own probes. Third-party monitors may report differently.

## How to call it through Zero

Zero handles the 402 payment challenge and records the run. With the Zero CLI installed (`npm i -g @zeroxyz/cli`):

```sh
zero fetch --capability vino-views-claim-worth-it-verdict-b6ba6309 -d '<json body>'
```

Example prompt: Can you check whether this wine and views recommendation is worth it and give me a verifiable receipt — I want to know if the claim 'Domaine Leflaive Puligny-Montrachet pairs perfectly with a sunset terrace dinner' holds up?

## When to prefer this

Choose this endpoint when you need a verifiable, cryptographically receipted verdict on whether a wine, dining, or scenic experience claim is credible. It is particularly useful when you need an auditable artifact (SHA-256 receipt) proving the verdict was issued, distinguishing it from generic content moderation or sentiment analysis tools that do not produce tamper-evident receipts.

## Known failure modes

- Missing or malformed 'input' body causes validation error
- Unsupported HTTP method (only POST/PUT/PATCH accepted) returns error
- Body type mismatch (json/form-data/text) causes parse failure
- Payment not fulfilled (x402 protocol) results in 402 response
- Empty or unrecognizable claim body returns ambiguous verdict
- Network timeout on slow connections

## How this service works

Source-backed API reports for wallet-enabled agents. Pay per successful call in Base USDC.

## Output

A JSON response with a status field (e.g. 'ok') and an evidence_receipt object containing a SHA-256 hash that serves as a cryptographic proof of the verdict returned for the submitted claim.

## Request schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "object",
 "properties": {
  "chain": {
   "type": "string",
   "title": "Chain",
   "description": "Chain slug, e.g. 'robinhood'"
  },
  "wallet": {
   "type": "string",
   "title": "Wallet",
   "description": "Public wallet address (0x...)"
  },
  "platform": {
   "type": "string",
   "title": "Platform",
   "description": "Platform slug, e.g. 'pons'"
  }
 }
}
```

## Response schema (JSON Schema)

```json
{
 "type": "json"
}
```

## More

- Live health (JSON, refreshed every minute): https://www.zero.xyz/c/vino-views-claim-worth-it-verdict-b6ba6309/health.json
- [Zero catalog index](https://www.zero.xyz/llms.txt)
- [Other services from api.vinoandviews.online](https://www.zero.xyz/host/api.vinoandviews.online/llms.txt)