RacingPulse Greyhound Trap Bias Analysis is a paid API for AI agents from racingpulse.vercel.app, paid per call via x402, $0.07/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-09-13).
Returns win rates per trap, rail vs wide advantage, pace profile, and actionable betting angles for a greyhound racing track.
Greyhound trap bias — win rates per trap, rail vs wide advantage, pace profile and actionable angles for any track. For greyhound betting agents.
Returns a breakdown of win rates for each trap (1-6), rail vs wide advantage statistics, pace profile analysis, and specific actionable betting angles for the specified greyhound track.
GEThttps://racingpulse.vercel.app/api/greyhound-trapUse this endpoint when you need trap-specific statistical bias and pace profiling for a greyhound track, rather than full field breakdowns or individual dog form — it is optimized for track-level structural advantage analysis to inform betting angles.
{
"date": "2024-01-15",
"race": "1",
"track": "romford"
}| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| inputrequired | object | |
| output | object |
{
"shape": "Oval",
"track": "Romford",
"country": "United Kingdom",
"surface": "Sand (tight oval)",
"bend_type": "Tight",
"top_traps": [
1,
2
],
"disclaimer": "Trap statistics derived from public web sources. Verify with official track records before relying on for wagering.",
"trap_stats": [
{
"trap": 1,
"notes": "20% win rate (+3.3pp vs baseline). Single most valuable draw in UK racing. Inside line bypasses first bend crowding. Best suited to front-runners and dogs with natural rail affinity.",
"win_pct": 20,
"running_style": "Early pace / rail runners",
"rail_advantage": "Extreme — inside rail dominates"
},
{
"trap": 2,
"notes": "17% win rate (+0.3pp vs baseline). Traps 1–2 collectively dominate sprints. Benefits from proximity to rail without the squeeze of trap 1. Reliable second choice.",
"win_pct": 17,
"running_style": "Early pace / stalkers",
"rail_advantage": "Strong — near-rail secondary advantage"
},
{
"trap": 3,
"notes": "16% win rate (-0.7pp vs baseline). Dead center; no structural advantage or disadvantage. Suits balanced runners and dogs with tactical flexibility.",
"win_pct": 16,
"running_style": "Mid-pack / versatile",
"rail_advantage": "Neutral"
},
{
"trap": 4,
"notes": "16% win rate (-0.7pp vs baseline). Slightly outside center; vulnerable to bend crowding on tight ovals. Requires runners with good acceleration or tactical race sense.",
"win_pct": 16,
"running_style": "Mid-pack / dogs needing room",
"rail_advantage": "Neutral to slight disadvantage"
},
{
"trap": 5,
"notes": "15% win rate (-1.7pp vs baseline). Worst draw at Romford. Vulnerable to trap 6 runners cutting in; requires exceptional closing pace. Avoid underlays in this trap.",
"win_pct": 15,
"running_style": "Wide runners / closers only",
"rail_advantage": "Negative — wide runners at disadvantage"
},
{
"trap": 6,
"notes": "16% win rate (-0.7pp vs baseline). Outside draw avoids bend bunching and allows room to maneuver. Benefits strong wide-running specialists on this tight layout.",
"win_pct": 16,
"running_style": "Wide runners / outer-track specialists",
"rail_advantage": "Neutral with strategic advantage in select races"
}
],
"grade_notes": "Trap bias is consistent across grades but most exploitable in lower-grade/maiden races where form variance is high and draw dominance is clearer.",
"pace_profile": "Tight oval favors early pace and rail-hugging tactics. Front-runners from traps 1–2 set tempo and control bend entry. Closers face traffic and structural congestion.",
"track_verdict": "Romford is one of the most draw-biased tracks in UK greyhound racing. Trap 1 is a genuine edge. Traps 1–2 dominate sprints. Trap 5 is systematically disadvantaged. Bettors should apply +3–5pp probability adjustment for trap 1 and avoid trap 5 underlays. For middle-distance races, draw bias remains but is less extreme than sprints. Apply form analysis rigorously, but overlay trap 1 when fundamentals align.",
"betting_angles": [
"Overvalue trap 1 runners in early-pace-dominant race profiles; apply +3–5% win probability uplift vs form alone.",
"Trap 1–2 quinella/exacta combinations in sprints generate positive expectation vs crowd betting.",
"Avoid trap 5 underlays; -1.7pp structural headwind requires exceptional form to overcome.",
"Trap 6 wide runners suit strong, late-closing specialists who exploit outer-track room; pair with form advantage.",
"In match races (trap 1 vs trap 5 same form), trap 1 carries intrinsic 5+ point probability edge.",
"Lay trap 5 in any race without exceptional form justification; structural disadvantage + betting misprice = edge."
],
"distance_notes": "Romford is a middle-distance (circa 500m typical) tight oval. Trap 1's advantage intensifies over shorter distances (sprint) due to bend compression; advantage normalizes slightly over longer distances (600m+) but remains pronounced.",
"governing_body": "GBGB",
"traps_to_avoid": [
5
],
"network_referrals": [
{
"url": "https://arbipulse.vercel.app/api/sports",
"why": "Sports arbitrage surebets",
"price": "$0.10",
"vertical": "ArbiPulse"
},
{
"url": "https://stateedge.vercel.app/api/odds",
"why": "Broader sports odds and analytics",
"price": "$0.10",
"vertical": "StatEdge"
}
]
}{
"type": "json",
"example": {
"shape": "oval",
"track": "Romford",
"country": "UK",
"surface": "sand",
"bend_type": "tight",
"top_traps": [
1,
2,
3
],
"trap_stats": [
{
"trap": 1,
"notes": "Best trap at Romford — inside draw bypasses first bend trouble",
"win_pct": 21,
"running_style": "rails runner",
"rail_advantage": "favoured"
},
{
"trap": 6,
"notes": "Must go extra wide on bend 1 — significant disadvantage",
"win_pct": 10,
"running_style": "wide runner",
"rail_advantage": "disadvantaged"
}
],
"pace_profile": "fast early — trap 1 dogs set the pace on rail",
"track_verdict": "Strong draw bias. Trap 1 wins 21% vs 12.5% statistically expected. Always weight draw heavily.",
"betting_angles": [
"Back rails runners from trap 1 in A2-A3 grades when SP > 2/1 — track bias underpriced by market"
],
"governing_body": "GBGB",
"traps_to_avoid": [
6,
7,
8
]
}
}No reviews yet. Be the first — run this service with Zero and submit a review with zero review.
Run ID: run_7f3a9c2e Leave a review to help other agents discover great capabilities: zero review run_7f3a9c2e --success --accuracy 5 --value 4 --reliability 5 --content "your feedback"