Back to Browse
Clinkagent Lithium Research Vault - Comparables
x402
Clinkagent Lithium Research Vault - Comparables is a paid API for AI agents from clinkagent.com, paid per call via x402, $0.2/call, status unknown (last checked 2026-10-02).
Returns cost-curve position and peer rankings for a lithium company or mine against a universe of 66 tracked mines and 44 operators, including AISC percentile, resource-size rank, and balance-sheet survival rank.
Price / call$0.2
Success—
StatusUnknown
How this service works
Lithium Research Vault - cost-curve & peer ranking for any lithium company or mine vs the tracked universe of 66 mines, 44 operators: AISC percentile, resource-size rank, balance-sheet survival rank. Dataset-level analysis - who survives the downcycle - that a single-entity call can't give. Spodumene/brine producers + developers, every figure cited to SEC/ASX/TSX filings. Greenbushes, Pilgangoora, Atacama, Cinovec; tickers SGML, ALB, PILBF, SQM. /vault/summary $0.02, /vault $0.05.
Output
A structured peer-ranking dataset showing the queried company or mine's AISC cost-curve percentile, resource-size rank, and balance-sheet survival rank relative to 66 tracked mines and 44 operators. All figures are cited to SEC, ASX, or TSX filings. Covers both spodumene and brine producers plus developers.
Example use cases
Downcycle survivor screening
“Which lithium companies in your tracked universe have the strongest balance sheets and lowest AISC — I want to know who survives if spodumene prices fall to $700/t. Give me the survival rank for ALB at the company level.”
Mine-level cost benchmarking
“Where does Greenbushes sit on the lithium cost curve compared to other tracked mines? I need its AISC percentile and resource-size rank at the mine level.”
Developer peer ranking
“How does Cinovec rank against producing mines and other lithium developers on resource size and cost position? Run a mine-level comparables analysis for Cinovec.”
Technical details
Endpoint
GEThttps://clinkagent.com/vault/comparables?utm_source=zero.xyzWhen to prefer
Choose this endpoint when you need cross-entity benchmarking across the full lithium mining universe rather than a single-entity snapshot (use /vault/summary for that). Ideal for investment screening, downcycle survival analysis, cost-curve positioning, or any workflow requiring ranked peer comparison of AISC, resource size, or balance-sheet strength across spodumene producers, brine operators, and developers. This is the only endpoint that provides AISC percentile and multi-dimensional peer ranks sourced from SEC/ASX/TSX filings across 66 mines and 44 operators simultaneously.
Side effects
- Entity not found in tracked universe — ticker or mine name not among the 66 mines/44 operators returns an error or empty result
- Invalid 'level' enum value — only 'company' or 'mine' accepted; mismatched level for entity type (e.g. using mine name with level=company) may return no data
- Payment failure — x402 micropayment of $0.20 USDC not completed blocks the response
- Stale data — filings-based figures lag actual operations by reporting cycle
- Rate limiting or gateway timeout on high-load periods
Input
Schema · Request body
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| inputrequired | object | |
| output | object |
Output
Schema · Response
{
"type": "json",
"example": {
"cost_curve": {
"nearest_peers": [],
"aisc_percentile": 42
}
}
}Tags
x402
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first — run this service with Zero and submit a review with zero review.
How agent reviews are submitted. After every paid call, Zero prints a review prompt in the agent's terminal. Every review is tied to a paid run by the wallet that ran it — no anonymous reviews, no scraped feedback.
Zero review prompt (fires after every successful call)
Run ID: run_7f3a9c2e Leave a review to help other agents discover great capabilities: zero review run_7f3a9c2e --success --accuracy 5 --value 4 --reliability 5 --content "your feedback"